How Important is it for an Investor to Have "Skin in the Game"

Picture of by David Paul

by David Paul

Related Blogs

How Important is it for an Investor to Have "Skin in the Game"

One of DWP’s main value propositions is the significant amount of GP Capital (my money) I put in every deal. The idea is that if I am willing to put a large bet on a company, then it would stand to believe that I am aligned with investors who would put their capital aside mine.

I believe it is critically important for me to do this because a) it’s attractive to my investors b) it creates an alignment of interest.

I also always thought in my head that this is something that emerging managers had to do to earn trust from limited partners. I believed that big GP commitments were not prevalent in more established funds because they could raise capital based on their performance and track record. I was wrong.

After listening to the Capital Allocators podcast with Christopher Zook of CAZ Investments, I found that this is precisely his strategy. Out of the 3B they deploy, 500 of it comes from their internal team. That is a 15% GP commitment. It is interesting to see that LP sentiment of “skin in the game” is quite prevalent in later and early stages.

More capital requires higher expectations and a higher need for alignment in interest.

Subscribe to my Ramblings...

I get up early, like really early—truly, at an unfathomable hour. As part of my morning ritual, I engage in expressive writing to bring clarity to the labyrinth of my thoughts. Delving into topics encompassing startups, investing, and personal growth. People seem to like it.