Investing in Features vs. Platforms in Early Days

Picture of by David Paul

by David Paul

Related Blogs

Investing in Features vs. Platforms in Early Days

One of my favorite things early-stage VCs say is when they pass on a deal because it is a “feature, not a platform.” Who comes to market with a fully-baked platform in the seed stage? Burn heavy, non-customer-centric founders that believe they know more than their customers, that’s who.

Building best-in-class features to a larger tech stack are how many of the best businesses are built. These companies pipe their way into their customer base- offer a better, quicker, and cheaper workflow than their competition, which will then earn trust.

Over time, the company will have continual conversations with its customers, bringing more features and eventually becoming a platform. The only caveat to this features vs. platform discussion in the early days is if the customer’s software spend so tiny that warranting multiple software licenses would ultimately be a bad experience for their customer.

My litmus test of great founders is those maniacally focused on building the best-in-class functionality for specific use cases in the early days but have a greater vision and roadmap to bring their product to be a platform.

Subscribe to my Ramblings...

I get up early, like really early—truly, at an unfathomable hour. As part of my morning ritual, I engage in expressive writing to bring clarity to the labyrinth of my thoughts. Delving into topics encompassing startups, investing, and personal growth. People seem to like it.